- This topic has 45 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Hi there guys!
I’m samscho, and I visited regrowth.com where a user called XD (Exdown) posted some great results using the Lazerfish from lllt-therapy.com.
Are there any news about him? Any other users that are using the lazerfish here in sweden?
Please share your experiences!
greets
-
XD wrote: Using the ultra or economy one XD?
The 140 mw one
If it ever breaks i’ll buy the lazerstand.
You should know that Lazerfish has special price on the bigger unit with stand, $1200! Would be very interesting if someone from this board tried it out!I will ask my friend R.Abramovich if hes willing to contribute with some money so someone can try it out. Unfortunately I will be broke in the autumn due to my hair laser removal therapy :DXD Is there even possiable for you to get better results? To me it looks like you got all the hair a man can have:] And one question for you XD or anyone out there knowing the anser! whats the diffrence between XD’s laser and the one they use in salonsThe diodes in XD:s device have more output power and is therefore more powerful. Im not exactly sure how much the total output power is though compared to lasers in salons. Im sure XD or someone else can be more precisemittvackrahar wrote: XD Is there even possiable for you to get better results? To me it looks like you got all the hair a man can have:] And one question for you XD or anyone out there knowing the anser! whats the diffrence between XD’s laser and the one they use in salons
Hey mittvackrahar. I definetly haven’t got 100% regrowth, so it’s very much possible for me to get more hair since i’m only 6 months into the progress. I’m gonna give it atleast 6 more months before saying “Ok, i’m not getting any more regrowth, but i’m extremely satisfied for what I have.”
As previous commenter said; the lazerfish lasers have higher output, but less diodes than a saloon one does. So it’s very effective for “punktbehandling”, but has longer treatment time for the entire exposed area (in my case).
Isnt it true that, higher power = possible regrowth, while the standard 650-655 is enabling you to KEEP your existing hair?So you might get regrowth with the higher powered lazerfish but you dont get to keep your existing.
W00t iz ze price for one of those lazer fish?TheHairGuy wrote: W00t iz ze price for one of those lazer fish?
About 4-500 $
damn screw the salons? lets all get lazerfishes!!! ok I would be really proud to you got some awsome results there man:] I am a bit jelous for sure!;]of course mittvackrahar. Fu%k the salons.raptor wrote: Here you have results from users using laser helmets
http://www.regrowth.com/hairloss-forums/viewthread.cfm?f=1&t=23460
Is there anyone tried this laser helmet? It nearly only get good responses on the HP!!!
Whats the dif btw the fish and this laser helmet?
Fellow wrote: Isnt it true that, higher power = possible regrowth, while the standard 650-655 is enabling you to KEEP your existing hair?
Penetrationsgraden är i huvudsak relaterad till nanometer (650-660nm), inte lika mycket till mW (även om den spelar en viss roll). Jag har fortfarande inte stött på några solklara bevis för att tex. 10mW eller 50mW skulle ge bättre resultat.
Vad man måste förstå i de här sammanhangen är att Lazerfish laserprodukter visserligen är specificerade att köra ut höga mW-tal (Typ 80mW), men eftersom laserljuset är ofokuserat och det är tänkt att man ska hålla en visst avstånd mellan skalp och produkt, kommer laserljuset vid nedslag på hjässan att ha förlorat en hel del mW, dock ej nm.
are there any bieffects with the lazerfish like the light being to strong and maybe having a risk of creating cancer? and what distance should you use?You should address these questions to Mike over at Lazerfish, he has a good reputation online and he knows at which distance the users should sit in order to lower the mW to the correct level.@XD: thanks for those pics: I know it’s annoying, but could you take a pic in this angle as well? (as precise as possible)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.